Please enter your login details

You can also sign in with your Sowetan LIVE,
Times LIVE account details.
   Sign Up   Forgot password?

Sign in with:

     
 
Thu May 23 18:19:46 SAST 2013

Springboks slip down world rankings to lowest point in 4 years

Craig Ray in Auckland | 19 October, 2011 00:064 Comments
Bismarck du Plessis of South Africa tackled during the IRB Rugby World Cup Quarter Final match between South Africa and Australia at Wellington Regional Stadium on October 09, 2011 in Wellington, New Zealand
Image by: Duif du Toit / Gallo Images

TO COMPOUND the gloom surrounding South Africa's quarterfinal World Cup exit, the Springboks have dropped out of the top three in the world rankings for the first time in nearly five years.

They are now fourth, behind New Zealand, Australia and France.

The Boks fell to No6 in November 2006 before clambering their way back to No1 following their victory at the 2007 World Cup.

Since then, they have never dropped out of the top three. After slipping to third briefly in August of 2008, they reclaimed top spot with victory in the 2009 Tri-Nations.

Since then it has been a slow decline for the Boks, who lost five out of six Tri-Nations matches in 2010 and compounded the misery with a loss to Scotland last November.

This year they lost three out of four Tri-Nations contests and bowed out of the World Cup at the quarterfinal stage.

Although the Boks dominated the quarterfinals against Australia, they lost 11-9 and despite consistently fielding their most experienced team in just about every match in the past two seasons, they've gone backwards.

Admittedly their World Cup loss was heavily prejudiced by a poor refereeing performance, but the decline has been steady and on closer inspection, alarming.

Former coach Jake White, who left the team after winning the 2007 World Cup with a No1 ranking, argued that South Africans should never accept elimination at the quarterfinal stage of the World Cup, regardless of the circumstances.

"You can't blame the referee entirely for the Boks' loss and the reality is that they've slipped well down from No1 in the world," White said.

"Having said that the squad they chose was the right one and you couldn't really say there were players in it that shouldn't have been there. So maybe the problem is elsewhere."

White wouldn't elaborate but clearly he questions the coaching, the game plan, or a combination of both.

While many people will argue White has an axe to grind with SA Rugby after being dumped following World Cup success, the inescapable truth is that the Springboks have been regressing.

When the World Cup ends in failure, years of losses are exposed for what they are - degeneration .

To submit comments you must first

Join the discussion & Debate

Springboks slip down world rankings to lowest point in 4 years

For Commenters Consideration | Please stick to the subject matter

COMMENTS [4]

AMS-Dammer

Posted 582 days ago
Avatar
Must ADMIT.... cannot say I am surprised!

With an IDIOT like Pieter de Villiers, I can't understand how they are still in the TOP 10.

Let's hope, once old HELIUM's contract expires, and he leaves the Bok Team alone, the Team can start BUILDING AGAIN and ACHIEVE again!!!

Avatar

guinnett

Posted 582 days ago
Agreed but from a New Zealand point of view, the Boks need to learn to play a more exciting brand of rugby. You have talented backs but still seem to prefer to play the old forward orientated style of game that the boring northern hemisphere teams play. It's much easier to defend against that style of play than a team that uses their backs and forwards together. Time to re-think your whole style of play.
Avatar

AMS-Dammer

Posted 582 days ago
I agree with you wholeheartedly... when Helium took over the reigns, he stated that "HE WILL CREATE A NEW STYLE OF SPRINGBOK RUGBY".....

Yeah... same style as they have been playing since 1995....

Boring, KICK N RUN.... KICK N RUN...

Let HOPE the new coach will INSTILL a NEW STYLE OF RUNNING RUGBY.... not that BORING BLUE BULLS / WEEPEE TYPE OF GRINDING THUD RUGBY!!!

MisterWendal

Posted 582 days ago
Avatar
I fail to understand why there is always a rush to get the opinion of a disgruntled former coach. Jake WhitesOnly had his chance - and was reasonably successful.
Peter de Villiers has now also had a chance - and despite being written off before he began, was also reasonably successful. Pointing fingers at the coach is cowardly - remember the coaching tactics in our last game saw us overwhelmingly dominate the match. I suppose the haters want the coach to score the points on the field as well!