Please enter your login details

You can also sign in with your Sowetan LIVE,
Times LIVE account details.
   Sign Up   Forgot password?

Sign in with:

     
 
Fri Apr 25 01:55:47 SAST 2014

FA explain reasons for Terry ban and fine

Reuters | 05 October, 2012 12:380 Comments
Arsenal v Chelsea - Premier League
Chelsea's John Terry
Image by: Richard Heathcote / Getty Images

The Football Association have released their report explaining why they rejected Chelsea captain John Terry’s defence and found the player guilty of racially insulting Queens Park Rangers defender Anton Ferdinand last year.

The FA published a 63-page document on Friday giving the reasons that led them to impose a four-match ban and 220000-pound ($355600) fine last week for an incident that occurred during a Premier League match at QPR’s Loftus Road ground.

  Terry, who has until Oct. 18 to appeal against the ban and fine, was found not guilty of a racially aggravated offence towards Ferdinand by London magistrates in July.

  The FA, who held their own inquiry into the incident, ruled they did not believe Terry was a racist, but they rejected his defence and said they had no doubt he racially abused Ferdinand in the game, after being provoked by the QPR player.

  In the document, the FA said there was “no credible basis” for the Chelsea skipper’s defence that he was only repeating words he believed the QPR defender had said to him.

  Terry admitted using the word “black” surrounded by highly offensive swear words during the match but claimed he had only been repeating words he thought Ferdinand had accused him of saying.

  In its full written report on the verdict, the FA’s independent regulatory commission said it was satisfied the words were intended as an insult by Terry.

   The document states: “The commission is quite satisfied, on the balance of probabilities, that there is no credible basis for Mr Terry’s defence that his use of the words ‘f****** black c***’ were directed at Ferdinand by way of forceful rejection and/or inquiry.

  “Instead, we are quite satisfied, and find on the balance of probabilities, that the offending words were said by way of insult.

  “We are able to arrive at that decision without needing to make any adverse findings against Mr Terry arising out of his decision not to give evidence.”

 Commenting on the character references that were provided by his Chelsea team-mates, the FA conclude that “it is accepted by everyone involved in the criminal and disciplinary proceedings that Mr. Terry is not a racist”.

  The FA decided to ban the 31-year-old on the basis that the commission was satisfied the words were intended as an insult.

To submit comments you must first

Join the discussion & Debate

FA explain reasons for Terry ban and fine

For Commenters Consideration | Please stick to the subject matter
Fri Apr 25 01:55:47 SAST 2014 ::

COMMENTS [0]